HP OfficeJet Pro L7780 All-in-One Review

I got an HP OfficeJet Pro L7780 All-in-One multifunction combination printer-scanner-fax-copier machine for a great price.  Somebody had bought it from Staples and then returned it, and for some reason Staples was now unloading it without the box.  I bought it, hoping maybe to use it for some scanning but mostly just planning to resell it as virtually new.

Then I proceeded to lug it around, as I moved to one apartment and then another, over a period of almost two years.  Its ink pretty much dried out -- it was still able to print a page, but it wasn't pretty.  Otherwise, though, it was essentially a new printer, worth a fair amount of money.  And I was willing to sell it, as long as I was satisfied that I should instead keep a smaller, possibly less functional Brother laser multifunction device that I'd been using for my printing and such.  I was pleased to see that ink for this thing was cheap, and it could do color.  So even though the HP was an inkjet rather than a laser, there was that possibility of selling the Brother instead.

Now the time had come to decide what to do with this thing.  HP made it just about as difficult as possible to use it.  They included a couple of CDs with it, one for the Mac and one for Windows 2000/XP, but I was using Windows 7.  Besides, I figured the software had surely been upgraded by now.  So I went to HP's website and downloaded the 32-bit Windows 7 software.

I installed that software.  It did not give me what I would have expected.  Browsing the icons in the Start Menu, I saw that I had links to the HP Solution Center, which was apparently a hardware troubleshooter, and to things like HP Update and Shop for HP Supplies.  There was also a read-me file, but it seemed to be oriented toward specific issues and did not lead to general-purpose software.  I did not have a link to any setup program or manual, and the provided link to the Product Support Website led to the page for the HP L7500, a different device.  I gave myself a corrected link to the correct webpage, and looked around to see what I could find there.  They had several downloads.  These included the Chinglish-named "Full Feature Software and Driver," a Home Network Diagnostic Utility, a Scan Diagnostic Utility, a Print Diagnostic Utility, a Hardware Diagnostic Utility, and a Windows 7 Printer Install Wizard.

At this moment, I was looking specifically for software that would allow me to configure the scanner (e.g., paper size, DPI, color/grayscale/B&W).  I had experimented with the confusingly named control panel on the machine (as distinct from the Windows 7 Control Panel) but had not ultimately been able to get the machine to scan from there.  So I ran the Scan Diagnostic Utility.  It asked me, "Which device do you want to use?" and gave me a choice between the Brother and the HP.  I also got a Chinglish error message that had been popping up now and then, which I assumed to be related to the HP and not the Brother:

Scanner not responding
Scanner is not responding.
If you see any confirmation dialog, please proceed with scan.  If no dialog is displayed you can try cycle the power of your device and restart Diagnostic Utility

I selected the HP and clicked Properties. I heard the HP adjust itself. There didn't seem to be anything I wanted to change in Properties, however, so I clicked OK.  Now I briefly saw a dialog that said "Scanning" and then the machine proceeded to scan.  The utility reported, "Scanning using WIA is working properly."  It was working; it just wasn't working for me.  The utility did not go on to test things I was curious about, including "Front Panel."  So I killed it.

As noted, I had tried using the machine's control panel, thinking that maybe I could just press its Scan button and scan that way.  I started with the Scan > Menu button.  It gave me a choice between "Scan and Reprint" or "Scan to Memory Device."  I didn't want to print what I was scanning, so I tried the latter.  I changed various settings and then pushed the Start Scan button.  The first time around, it had said, "Memory device was not found."  My search on that error led to the advice to make changes on the control panel.  I had plugged a USB drive into its USB port, but this had not solved the problem.  This time, however, it went ahead and scanned, and it saved the scan on the USB jump drive.  So this was good.

I still wanted to change the settings on the scanner.  Following the read-me, I went back to HP Solution Center > Settings > Scan Settings, hoping that I would now have better luck with it than I had had before running the diagnostic utility.  I went into Scan Settings > Scan Picture Settings.  This gave me an error:

Destination Component has stopped working.
Windows can check online for a solution to the problem.

I chose the "Check online for a solution and close the program" option instead of just "Close the program."  I got an error:

A required software component was not found or was improperly installed.  Reinstall the HP Photosmart software that came with the device, and try scanning again.

This was possibly the third time I had installed that software.  This time, I decided to uninstall it first and then reinstall.  At first, I started to uninstall manually, from Control Panel.  Then I remembered there was an uninstaller.  I ran that.  It went smoothly.  It wanted to reboot again.  Then it was done.  Now I reinstalled the software.  I went back to the HP Solution Center.  It gave me the same "Destination Component has stopped working" error message.  I also got the "Memory device was not found" error when I tried scanning from the panel.  I ran the scanning diagnostic utility again.  This time it checked all items, all the way down to the last one, Front Panel, where it said this:

The HP Scan Diagnostic Utility has detected some issues with the printer Front Panel settings.  Click 'Fix' to resolve these issues.

I did exactly what they suggested.  Now I got a new error:

The Utility could not fix this issue.  Turn the product off, turn it on again, and then click Restart Computer.  If the issue persists, you should uninstall, and then reinstall the product software.  Remove the software by clicking Uninstall Software.  Reinstall the software with the product CD or by downloading the most current Full Feature Software from the HP Web site (Recommended).

I turned off and back on and restarted the computer and re-ran the scanner utility.  Same error message.  Couldn't think of a solution, so I tried just actually scanning from the Front Panel.  It scanned.  I clicked on Retest, there in the scanner utility's dialog.  Same error.  I closed out of the utility and went back to the HP Solution Center.  Still couldn't adjust Scan Settings > Scan Picture Settings there.  I tried Scan Settings > Document Settings:  same errors as above.  I was, however, able to go into Scan Settings > Scan Preferences.

The default Text scan quality was great.  I decided to just go ahead and do some scanning and see how things developed.  It scanned just fine to the USB drive.  It was slow and noisy compared to the Brother device, however.  I basically had my answer.  I was not looking for a large device, nor for an opportunity to spend hours making its software work for me.  There were probably other people out there who loved HP, or whose systems would work very well with it.  But for me, rather than move the thing again, it was time to sell.

Installing a Brother MFC-7340 Printer in Ubuntu 10.04

I was installing Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid Lynx) on a desktop computer.  I wanted to get my Brother MFC-7340 printer working from within Ubuntu.  I had not been able to make it work with Ubuntu 9.10, but now I had found a post where mdgrech described how it could be done.  The steps I took were as follows:

sudo -i

aa-complain cupsd

mkdir /usr/share/cups/model

mkdir /var/spool/lpd

apt-get install sane-utils

apt-get install psutils

It puzzled me that mdgrech’s link led to the LPR driver for the MFC-7420.  I suspected he knew exactly what he was doing; but just in case that was a mistaken link, I went to the Brother Linux driver download page and downloaded the Debian LPR driver for the MFC-7340 instead.  This gave me a file called brmfc7340lpr-2.0.2-1.i386.deb.  To install the LPR driver, Brother advised using CUPS if it was working on my system.  I wasn’t sure if it was.  I was advised to try this:  “sudo /etc./init.d/cups status.”  That said “cupsd is running.”  Now what?  I followed the links to the Cupswrapper Driver Install page.  There, I had to follow certain “pre-required procedures.”  These appeared to be more or less the steps that mdgrech had already had me take (above).  So apparently he had used the CUPS approach too.  Encouraged, I continued along this CUPS route.  There was some disagreement on the next step.  Brother said that I should turn on the printer and connect it to the computer now; mdgrech seemed to say I should install the driver first.  I wound up not connecting the printer until later.  Meanwhile, it seemed that I would need to be installing the cupswrapper driver as well as the LPR driver, so I went back to the download page and did that.  This gave me a download called cupswrapperMFC7340-2.0.2-1.i386.deb.  The next steps were to navigate to the folder where I had downloaded brmfc7340lpr-2.0.2-1.i386.deb and then type these commands:

dpkg -i --force-all brmfc7340lpr-2.0.2-1.i386.deb

dpkg -i --force-all cupswrapperMFC7340-2.0.2-1.i386.deb

dpkg -l | grep Brother

The next step was to go to http://localhost:631/printers.  It showed the printer.  So now I did turn on the printer and plug in the USB cable.  (Note that there are slightly different instructions if your connection is ethernet.)  Ubuntu saw the printer, but gave me a “Missing printer driver” note in the upper right corner of the screen, and then said “Searching for available drivers.”  Eventually it gave me a New Printer dialog.  

Note:  mdgrech had advised, instead, to go to http://localhost:631/admin, select Add printer, choose Brother MFC-7340, choose “Another Make/Manufacturer,” select the MFC-7340, and click Add Printer.  Since I had gone to http://localhost:631/printers as Brother advised, I was now at the New Printer dialog, so I proceeded from there.  I selected “Select printer from database” (with Brother highlighted) > Forward > MFC7340 for CUPS > Brother MFC7340 for CUPS [en] (recommended) > Forward.  I went with the defaults in the “Describe Printer” dialog > Apply.  I printed a test page.  It worked!

There was one other thing I needed to check.  On this Ubuntu machine, I was running Windows XP in a virtual machine in VMware, and had previously tried to install the MFC-7340 from there.  I still had it listed as a printer.  So I went into VMware at this point and tried printing from there.  The print job queued up, but it didn’t print.  I ran Brother’s Installation Diagnostics software, there in Windows XP, and it reported failure:  “Cannot communicate with the machine.”  I went into Start > Settings > Printers and Faxes (right-click) > right-click on the Brother MFC-7340 Printer > Properties > Ports tab.  I checked the box next to the USB003 port, which was the only port that specifically referred to the Brother MFC-7340.  I clicked OK and tried printing again.  Once again, it queued but did not print.  Then it occurred to me that, of course, I would have to go into VMware’s VM > Removable Devices.  There, sure enough, I saw “Brother Printer.”  I clicked Connect.  The queue dialog said, “Printing,” and then it did print.

The other thing I really wanted to be able to do with the Brother MFC-7340 was to scan.  This appeared to be an entirely different process, so I started another post for that.  Otherwise, with this step finished, I returned to the project of tweaking Ubuntu 10.04, as described in a separate post.

Review: Canon imageCLASS MF5770 Multifunction Printer/Scanner/Fax

I'll start with an excerpt from writeup I recently prepared to sell my MF5730, which I have recently replaced with an MF5770. I have used the MF5770 for only a week or so. It is virtually identical to the 5730 (and, I assume, to others in the MF5700 series); the main difference is that the 5770 has a fax capability.

* * * * *

Re: the Canon imageCLASS® MF5730 Laser Multifunction Printer - Copier - Scanner. The CNET editor says, “Any small office shopping for a no-nonsense laser multifunction should count this model among its top picks.” (See their video on it.) The Consumer Guide expert review gives it 3 out of 5 (average), but they also gave it a Best Buy award, and the reviewer’s only complaints were that it is only for Windows computers and it doesn’t have a fax feature. I have used this model primarily for scanning. I have used a half-dozen scanners over the past ten years. This one probably has the most reliable paper handling of any of them. Scan quality depends on your settings and so forth; you do have the option of making very good scans. Overall, this has been a reliable and good-quality performer.

* * * * *

Since writing that note, I have come up with a number of things I would add to it, as follows: 1. There is no on-off switch on either model. According to Canon, "The scan lamp for the MF5730 [and also the MF5770] will stay on constantly, even in the Energy Saver mode. This is normal operation. The reason for this is to reduce the warm up period on the first copy or scan after coming out of Energy Saver mode. The scanner has been designed to operate in this manner and should not adversely affect the life of the lamp." This seems like a design flaw to me. It uses electricity unnecessarily. Also, as I have discovered, when you turn out the lights and leave, your scanner may be the brightest light in the room -- which means that, if there is a moth in the room, you will find pieces of it sticking to your scans and smeared across your scanning lamp when you come in the next day and insert some papers for scanning. Or, if you happen to be using the scanner in your home office, you will now have a nightlight which may brighten your room more than you would have preferred. 2. Speaking of design flaws, they should have hired a designer for the shape of the machine. It is big. They have done a good job of driving the size upwards in a tapered way that reduces the footprint. But it is still big. Also, the "natural bridge" design, in which the printer shoots paper out from the machine's midsection, is one that had great potential. Somehow, though, it turned out ugly. While we're on the subject of design, I would also suggest changing the paper tray concept. It sticks out the back, at the bottom. It seems like it is just begging to get broken, the first time someone puts it down on an uneven surface. The paper tray, like a few other parts, unfortunately departs from the machine's overall solid feel: it feels flimsy and cheap. So does the alternate sheet feeder, which easily loses its grip on pages, resulting in a real or imaginary paper jam. Meanwhile, the printer's output paper tray holds just a few printed sheets, before pages start spilling out. Something similar happens with the scanner's output tray, if one outcoming sheet happens to snag one that's already in the tray. Also, for some reason the scanner's paper feeder does not self-clear when you restart the machine; there will be times when you will have to tug pages out manually (and it's not easy). 3. They neglected some important details. I was dismayed at the poor quality of their documentation on scanning. I wished they had provide calibration marks along the sides of the platen, so I could tell how big your documents were and could adjust my settings accordingly. I was also very disappointed that there is no possibility of scanning above 300 DPI. This is a real step backwards; I think every scanner I have used in the past ten years has been superior in that regard. On the positive side, they include a starter cartridge that prints 2500 copies. Printing quality is good; so is scanning quality, though I have to use weird settings (Brightness -20, Contrast +13) to achieve it. You don't get that sharp, high-pitched whistle, from this scanner, that you will get from some others. Tech support is very responsive and, in my limited experience, is adequately knowledgable, at least if you reach them over the phone. In sum, as you can tell, I appreciate the MF5700 series and I expect to be using my new MF5770 for years to come.